Adsorbent Chemical Plant for Carbon Capture
Timeline
March 2023 - June 2023
Client
Chemical Engineering Product Design Class
Capture and Storage of CO2
Escalating concerns surrounding climate
change and the rising levels of carbon dioxide
(CO2) in the atmosphere have underscored the urgent
need for effective carbon capture and sequestration
technologies.
In this project we were
tasked with building a plant that would capture
at least 1 million pounds of CO2 annually from air
and prevent its reentry into the atmosphere for at
least a 1000 years . We were also given that the
plant should be able to operate at near ambient
conditions and around 60% humidity.
Assessment of Different Methods
Focusing primarily on energy efficiency as our main efficiency metric, we found that adsorbent capture methods are generally more energy-efficient than absorbents, operating under ambient conditions with minimal energy input. .
After a literature review, we used a criterion matrix to hone in on two promising options, nanostructured and hybrid adsorbents. We assessed critical metrics like regeneration energy, adsorbent stability, adsorption capacity, and selectivity, alongside considering cost, scalability, environmental impact, and technology maturity.
Determination and Evaluation of Process
Following the down-select matrix we decided to use hybrid MOFs for our process specifically mmen-Mg2(dobpdc) . We proposed a five-step Temperature-Vacuum Swing Adsorption (TVSA) for the carbon capture process. We also decided to use underground injection for carbon capture due to energy efficiency.
To evaluate the system's feasibility under the specified conditions, we conducted a series of calculations to ascertain the required energy input, determine the necessary reactor sizes, and assess the capability of the hybridized MOF to capture the designated amounts of CO2.
Energy Requirements and Cost
Our finalized design leverages the hybrid MOF mmen-Mg2(dobpdc) within a Temperature-Vacuum-Swing Adsorption (TVSA) plant for direct air capture of CO2, subsequently employing underground injection for its perpetual storage.
In terms of energy demands, the industrial procedure is projected to require approximately 324,265 kWh annually, with a estimated yearly expenditure of $56,699. When integrated with sequestration costs, the annual total is anticipated to be around $77,111.